I can’t count the number of conversations I’ve had over the years about the overwhelming whiteness and maleness of AAG, and its discouraging reflection of the overwhelming whiteness and maleness of Geography. But the stable demographics of conference panels mask a notable increase in the number of women and people of color in our field. AAG sessions were probably never an accurate reflection of the make up of Geography, but the level of distortion is starting to shift the conversation from discouragement to outrage.
So here’s the thing I’ve finally realized as a result of that outrage: AAG is not a reflection of our field, it’s a key site for changing it. Like the more obvious intervention points of grad school admissions, hiring, tenure and promotion, and citation practices, changing the composition of AAG panels changes our field. It does so by making women and scholars of color and their work more visible, and by changing the intellectual debate to reflect a broader range of viewpoints.
The manifesto below was developed collectively over the summer as one starting point for encouraging collective change. Since then, many more people have signed onto it. All of us are committing to ourselves and to each other that we will change our AAG organizing practices to bring them into better alignment with our politics.
I am late to this party; many people have been fighting to change AAG for a good long time now, and my thinking has really changed thanks to conversations with some of them over the last few years. It’s past time I added my voice to theirs. I hope you will consider adding yours as well.
P.S. A number of people have gotten in touch to ask if they can add their name to the Manifesto. We’d be delighted to have more folks on here! Just send me an email and I’ll add you. I hope you will forgive me any typos on the list below. I am an unimpressive speller and a WordPress novice, which is a bad combination.
Manifesto on the gender and racial composition of AAG panels
Geography is still predominantly white and male, but there are far more women and people of color than in previous decades. This matters not only for the individuals involved – who geographers are – but for the content of geographic research and analysis – what Geography is and does. Yet this shift in the racial and gender composition of the field is often not fully reflected at key sites and moments, including the composition of and attendance at conference panels, inclusion in syllabi and special issues, citations, and the hiring, evaluation, and promotion of faculty.
All of these sites of ongoing discrimination are critical locations for intervention. In response to colleagues who for years have asked us to consider these issues, and reflecting critically on our own experiences and participation, we wish to focus on one: the composition of and attendance at panels and sessions at the annual AAG meeting. We think it’s time to make some commitments. With session organizing already underway, but the deadline still well off, we commit to making the lineup of presenters in our panels and sessions as inclusive as possible, and invite others to do the same. And when the meetings begin, we commit to broadening the sessions we attend. We think this is especially important for those of us who are senior scholars, and that doing so will make for a better discipline and for better scholarship.
Making this more than a rhetorical commitment will require collective work. Many of you are already organizing AAG panels more representative of the changing composition of the field. But if this is a new project for you, here are some ways we might collectively tackle it:
- If you are writing a CFP, consider explicitly encouraging alternative perspectives in your CFP, or adjusting the topical focus to broaden its appeal.
- If you are organizing a session and don’t know the excellent women and people of color who could contribute to it, advertise the session widely and ask around: we are advocating relevant and broadening intellectual fit, not tokenism. Consider inviting a woman or person of color to co-organize with you.
- If you are responding to a CFP, encourage topically-appropriate female and/or scholars of color to join you in submitting abstracts.
- And when you plan your conference itinerary, commit to attending sessions that include speakers and perspectives that may challenge your ideas and your professional practices.
We realize that if many of us begin following these suggestions it could potentially create an increased burden on women and people of color who often already do more than their share of service. Yet a major part of our argument is that there is already more diversity in Geography than many in the discipline realize, and many scholars would prefer to decline an invitation than be overlooked for a session for which they are an excellent fit. We also recognize that in some cases our efforts to create more inclusive sessions may fail. That does not excuse us from trying: if we change the composition of our panels, and think critically about those we attend, we will be one step closer to changing the power dynamics in our discipline.
Finally, we recognize that this proposal is only a very partial fix. Race and gender are just two of a number of pertinent axes of power and exclusion, including class, sexual orientation, disability, and language. And, as we note above, the composition of conference sessions is just one site among many at which these dynamics play out in academic disciplines. Our hope with this proposal is to jumpstart changes in our collective expectations for session organization that can form the basis of wider challenges to the operation of structural power in Geography, and in academia more broadly.
Authors
Bruce Braun, University of Minnesota
Sapana Doshi, University of Arizona
Julie Guthman, UC Santa Cruz
Rebecca Lave, Indiana University
Becky Mansfield, Ohio State
James McCarthy, Clark
Sharlene Mollett, University of Toronto
Tracey Osborne, University of Arizona
Scott Prudham, University of Toronto
Morgan Robertson, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Wendy Wolford, Cornell
Supporters
Majed Akhter, Indiana University
Ishan Ashutosh, Indiana University
Association of Pacific Coast Geographers Women’s Network
Teo Ballve, Colgate
Jessica Barnes, University of South Carolina
Oliver Belcher, Oulu University
Jess Bier, Erasmus University
Trevor Birkenholtz, University of Illinois-UC
Anne Bonds, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Rachel Brahinsky, University of San Francisco
Jennifer Brewer, University of New Hampshire
Elizabeth Brown, San Francisco State University
Ryan Burns, Temple University
Bram Buscher, Wageningen University
Lisa Campbell, Duke University
Ed Carr, Clark
Jennifer Casolo, Universidad Rafael Landivar
Tina Catania, Syracuse University
John Paul Catungal, UBC
Fletcher Chmara-Huff, Temple University
Jessie Clark, University of Nevada-Reno
Dan Cockayne, University of Kentucky
Chris Coggins, Bard College
Mat Coleman, Ohio State
Rosemary Collard, Concordia
Ian Cook, University of Exeter
Nick Crane, Ohio Wesleyan University
Julie Cupples, University of Edinburgh
Martin Danyluk, University of Toronto
Hugh Deaner, University of Kentucky
Jessica Dempsey, University of Victoria
Sara Diamond, University of Texas
Jose Diaz-Garyua, University of Louisville
Lindsey Dillon, UC Davis
Mona Domosh, Dartmouth
Lorraine Dowler, Penn State
Amelia Duffy-Tumasz, Rutgers University
Patricia Ehrkamp, University of Kentucky
Jody Emel, Clark
Salvatore Engel-DiMauro, SUNY New Palz
Caroline Faria, UT Austin
Matthew Farish, University of Toronto
Michael Finewood, Pace University
John Finn, Christopher Newport University
Carolyn Finney, University of Kentucky
Levi Gahman, University of the West Indies
Emily Gilbert, University of Toronto
Lauren Gifford, University of Colorado-Boulder
Banu Gokariksel, University of North Carolina
Garrett Graddy-Lovelace, American University
Graduate Student Affinity Group of the AAG
Noella Gray, University of Guelph
Kirsten Greer, Nipissing University
Trina Hamilton, SUNY University at Buffalo
Allison Hayes-Conroy, Temple University
Rich Heyman, UT Austin
Nik Heynen, University of Georgia
Eric Huntley, University of Kentucky
Josh Inwood, University of Tennessee
Adam Jadhav, Panchabhuta Conservation Foundation
Mark Kear, University of Arizona
Eje Kim, Gyeongin National University of Education, S. Korea
Brian King, Penn State
Sarah Knuth, University of Michigan
Mary Lawhon, Florida State University
Diana Liverman, University of Arizona
Jessa Loomis, University of Kentucky
Elizabeth Cedar Louis, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jenna Loyd, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Nerve Macaspac, UCLA
Geoff Mann, Simon Fraser
Deborah Martin, Clark
Kathleen McAfee, San Francisco State University
Katie Meehan, University of Oregon
Emily Mitchell-Eaton, Syracuse University
Sarah Moore, University of Wisconsin
Carrie Mott, University of Kentucky
Emma Gaalaas Mullaney, Bucknell University
Dustin Mulvaney, San Jose State University
Lisa Naughton, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Abigail Neely, Dartmouth
Ingrid Nelson, University of Vermont
Leonie Newhouse, Max Planck Institute
Richard Nisa, Fairleigh Dickinson University
Elsa Noterman, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Patricia Noxolo, University of Birmingham
Kris Olds, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Elizabeth Olson, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Arnisson Andre Ortega, University of the Phillipines
Natalie Oswin, McGill University
David O’Sullivan, UC Berkeley
Stefan Ouma, Goethe University, Frankfurt
Aparna Parikh, Penn State
Kate Parizeau, University of Guelph
Eric Perramond, Colorado College
Curtis Pomilia, University of Kentucky
Carolyn Prouse, UBC
Anne Ranek, University of Arizona
Malini Ranganathan, American University
Douglas Richardson, Association of American Geographers
Paul Robbins, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Ben Rogaly, University of Sussex
Heather Rosenfeld, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Simon Runkel, University of Heidelberg
Scott Salmon, New School
Graciela Sandoval, Texas State University
Richard Schein, University of Kentucky
Anna Secor, University of Kentucky
Eric Sheppard, UCLA
Jamie Shinn, Texas A&M University
Rachel Silvey, University of Toronto
Gregory Simon, University of Denver
Rachel Slocum, School for International Training
Sara Smith, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Matthew Sparke, University of Washington
Ang Subulwa, University of Wisconsin-Osh Kosh
Farhana Sultana, Syracuse University
Juanita Sundberg, UBC
Kaitlin Tasker, University of Texas-Austin
Jim Thatcher, University of Washington-Tacoma
Deborah Thien, California State University Long Beach
Sarah Turner, McGill University
Margath (Maggie) Walker, University of Louisville
Margaret Walton-Roberts, Wilfred Laurier University
Case Watkins, Louisiana State University
Marion Werner, SUNY University at Buffalo
Michael Widener, University of Toronto-St George
Peter Wilshusen, Bucknell University
Matt Wilson, University of Kentucky
Keith Woodward, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Richard Wright, Dartmouth
Lauren Wustenberg, McGill University
Melissa Yang Rock, SUNY New Palz
As a new mother planning to miss AAG this year, certainly this topic strikes a particular chord. One can advocate for things like childcare provision, but small children typically don’t travel well- certainly mine doesn’t! For me, the stress of child evening/night management after leaving a little one alone in a strange place with strangers is more that I’m prepared to undertake, something I hadn’t quite worked out until faced with the choice myself.
It reminds me of the well circulated commentary about “why women still can’t have it all” by Anne-Marie Slaughter.
Whatever the opportunities or invitations, I won’t be at AAG or conferences more generally as often as I would without a child. There are structural and cultural pieces there, there is individual choice there, and we can work at splitting that down. And surely, I don’t mean to generalize my case, and what is true about gender is not the same for race. But I also want to add that we wrestle with the expectations of travel and how being successful by attendance at such events constrains women’s choices. (I note that it’s true for parents more generally, though often borne more by mothers.) As Slaughter and others have noted, the time to “climb the ladder” is early in the career, and for many of us that’s also when our children and youngest, most needy and least comfortable travelling.
Pingback: CFP> Mapping (from) the minor of big data? | Sam Kinsley
Pingback: Resources for thinking through race and gender in Geography | Knowledge Politics